Operations Management-BUSI-3321:Analyzing Operations Strategies in Real-World Businesses

/in /by

Analyzing Operations Strategies in Real-World Businesses

Operations Management-BUSI-3321

Group Project

 

Objective:

To apply operations management concepts by analyzing the operations strategies of real-world businesses. The focus will be on identifying and evaluating the key operations practices that contribute to the company’s success or challenges.

Instructions:

  1. Group Formation: Form groups of 3-4 students.
  2. Company Selection:
  • Choose a company or organization (can be a local business or a global corporation) that interests your group.
  • Ensure the company has sufficient publicly available information regarding its operations (e.g., annual reports, case studies, news articles).
  1. Key Areas to Analyze:
  • Operations Strategy: Identify the company’s operations strategy (e.g., cost leadership, differentiation, and focus on quality or innovation). Discuss how this strategy aligns with the company’s overall business strategy.
  • Process Design: Describe the company’s approach to process design (e.g., how they produce goods or deliver services). Discuss efficiency, capacity, and flexibility.
  • Supply Chain Management: Analyze the company’s supply chain structure. Discuss sourcing, logistics, and distribution strategies.
  • Quality Management: Evaluate the company’s quality management practices (e.g., use of Six Sigma, Total Quality Management).
  • Technology in Operations: Explore the role of technology in their operations, including any automation or use of information systems.
  • Sustainability: Assess the company’s sustainability practices in its operations. Discuss how they address environmental and social responsibilities.
  1. Analysis and Recommendations:
  • Provide a critical analysis of the company’s operational strengths and weaknesses.
  • Suggest improvements or alternative strategies the company could adopt to enhance its operations.

 

 

  1. Report Structure:

– Introduction: Overview of the company and its industry.

– Operations Strategy: Detailed analysis as per the key areas listed above.

– Critical Evaluation: Identification of operational challenges and strengths.

– Recommendations: Based on your analysis, suggest strategies or improvements.

– Conclusion: Summarize the key findings of your analysis.

  1. Report Format:

– Length: 3000-4000 words.

– Use diagrams, charts, and tables where necessary to support your analysis.

– Include references to academic and industry sources.

  1. Presentation:

– Prepare a 10-15 minute presentation summarizing your findings and recommendations.

– The presentation should be clear, concise, and use visual aids.

  1. Submission Deadline: A week before Finals

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Project Rubric

Criteria Description Grades
Introduction (2) Clarity and relevance of the company and industry overview.  
Operations Strategy Analysis (4) Depth of analysis of the company’s operations strategy and alignment with its business strategy.  
Process Design (3) Evaluation of the company’s process design, including efficiency, capacity, and flexibility.  
Supply Chain Management (3) Analysis of sourcing, logistics, and distribution strategies.  
Quality Management (3) Insightful evaluation of the company’s quality practices (e.g., Six Sigma, TQM).  
Technology in Operations (2) Assessment of the role of technology in the company’s operations, including automation or systems.  
Sustainability (2) Evaluation of sustainability practices and environmental/social responsibility.  
Recommendations & Conclusion (1) Practicality, creativity, and clarity of suggested improvements or strategies.  
Total Grade (20)    

Presentation Rubric (5 Grades Total)

Criteria Description Grades
Clarity & Structure (4) Logical flow of content and adherence to time limits.  
Content Delivery (4) Effectiveness in summarizing findings and recommendations.  
Visual Aids (2) Use of visuals (slides, charts, diagrams) to enhance understanding.  
Total (10)    

 

 

Strategic Planning

/in /by

Strategic Planning
You have successfully gained a junior management role in the UK in an organisation called Vista, which is a multi-national
company. This is an interesting time for the business as it has decided to review its mission, vision and strategic direction. In this
process the Board wishes to involve staff at various levels in the organisation and it has established a series of teams which will
look at the strategy and feedback their work to the Board. You have been asked to join Team Singapore which is comprised of staff
from across the company. It will work virtually before meeting in Singapore for a final face to face session.
This is an exciting opportunity for your personal and career development and you are keen to make the most of it.
Task 1
In preparation for the first virtual meeting you decide to make detailed notes in which you:
 explain organisational vision, mission, strategy and business plansand the relationships between them
 explain how external factors affect organisations and how changes in the external environment affect organisational strategy
 evaluate how stakeholder expectations influence organisations
Task 2
At the first virtual meeting of the team all members have been asked to make an individual contribution, which will be circulated to
other team members prior to the next meeting. Your task is to provide a document which:
 analyses the mission and vision statements of named organisations.
To gain a merit
grade you must have a further section in the document which:
 evaluates the impact of a named organisation’s vision and mission on its strategy.
To gain a distinction
grade you must add another section to the document which:
 analyses how external influences affect organisational strategy in a named organisation.
Task 3
Following the virtual meeting you have been asked to review an organisation’s strategy and business plans as this may influence
thinking for Vista’s future direction.
Produce a presentation with accompanying notes which:
 explains the importance of review in developing organisational strategy and business plans.
 evaluates the tools which can be used to review organisational strategy and business plans
To gain a merit
grade your presentation must also:
 review the position of an organisation in its current market using appropriate tools.
To gain a distinction
grade your presentation must also:
 analyse the competitive strengths and weaknesses of an organisation’s current business strategy and business plans.
Task 4
Whilst completing the above tasks your team has decided that there is clearly a number of strategic options to consider. With this in
mind you decide to model strategy options for a smaller organisation as an illustration. Produce a document for circulation which
develops:
 strategy options for a chosen organisation, using modelling tools
 criteria for reviewing the potential strategy options.
To gain a merit
grade you must also:
 apply the criteria and evaluate the options for delivering the strategic direction of the organisation you have chosen.
Task 5
The Board has decided that the meeting in Singapore should take place and you have received your travel and accommodation
documents. The agenda for the meeting will include how to create a strategic plan. In preparation for this critical meeting you
decide to produce a file for your own use. The file will:
 explain the structure of a plan needed to deliver the strategy
 explain how stakeholders are involved in the formulation of the plan
 provide a dissemination process to ensure stakeholders are informed and committed to the plan.
To gain a merit
grade you must also:
 create monitoring systems to ensure the successful implementation of a strategic plan.
To gain a distinction
grade you must also:
 construct a strategic plan for a named organisation

REVIEWING ORGANISATIONAL STRATEGY PLANS AND PERFORMANCE

/in /by

REVIEWING ORGANISATIONAL STRATEGY
PLANS AND PERFORMANCE

Introduction
The unit will explore the strategic aims and objectives of an organisation and their
significance in setting direction, identifying success and progress for the organisation.
The unit will also explore where different strategic options may lead the organisation to
change its direction.

Scenario

Learners may use their own employment context, or that of another organisation with which
they are very familiar, to base their assignment. However, in the case that they are not able to
do so, please use the below scenario: –

You are a manager at a medium sized organisation. You have been asked to review your
organisational strategic plan to establish if suitable progress is being made to meet the
organisation’s strategic objectives. Analysis of internal and external factors affecting the plan
is part of your remit and it has been suggested you examine options to meet the plan which
are more effective and cost efficient. From your analysis you need to justify your
recommendations and so, valid and realistic options need to be produced.

If you will be using the scenario please select and research an organisation of your choice
with regards to their strategic plan. Provide details of your research and a short summary of
the information you have found in order that the assessor may contextualise your responses
to the tasks below. The summary is expected to be between 200 and 250 words.

Task 1:

Critically analyse the current strategic aims and objectives of your chosen scenario /
organisation, you may wish to consider the fuller hierarchy of objectives, within your critical
analysis, enable greater detection of misalignment. Use techniques and modelling to underpin
your critical analysis, where feasible.

Decompose your organisational strategy into logical component parts, it is likely that each
functional area will have their own customized strategies and tactics; it is within this sphere
that misalignment often occurs. Not all component parts of the strategy will have the same
value or level of risk; this may be considered in your analysis.

Critically conduct an environmental scan focused on environmental factors in the short and
medium term, short being up to one year, longer term being up to three years.

Guideline word count: 750 – 850 words

A.C. 1.1 – Critically analyse the existing strategic aims and objectives of the
organisation

A.C. 1.2 – Undertake a critical evaluation of the components of current organisational
strategy

Page 2 of 4
A.C. 1.3 – Critically analyse the factors affecting the strategic aims of organisational
strategy over the short and medium term

Task 2:

Conduct an audit customised for the purpose of signposting the activities within the processes
of working towards existing strategic aims and objectives. Embed diagnostic tools from across
the business domain to add validity and confident in the auditing activity.

Identify ten stakeholders connected with the organisation and evaluate their expectations.
Undertake stakeholder mapping to analyse the power and influence they have upon the
organisational strategy. Strategic Stakeholder Tooling is recommended for this task.

Evolve a strategic positioning map or tool(s) to enable critical analysis of the business
processes and activities towards the achievement of the current strategic posit.

Guideline word count: 750 – 850 words

A.C. 2.1 Apply a range of diagnostic and analytical tools to audit and assess progress
towards existing strategic aims and objectives

A.C. 2.2 Take responsibility for and critically assess the expectations of all
stakeholders and their influence upon future organisational strategy

A.C. 2.3 critically analyse, interpret and produce an evaluation of the existing
organisational strategic position and progress towards achieving the existing strategy.
Use at least three recognised strategic tools

Task 3:

Deploy strategic options tools to support the critical evaluation of your identified range of
strategic options in the short and medium term. Conduct critical analysis of the value of your
chosen tools, together with suitable criteria for the selection of use of such tools. Supporting
factors may be such factors as profit, core competencies, quality, competitive factors and
business processes.

Determine and justify the evolved strategic option(s) and assess its suitability in contributing
to meeting any revised strategic posit.

Guideline word count: 750 – 900 words

A.C. 3.1 critically evaluate and develop a range of alternative strategic options to meet
organisational strategic aims, direction and objectives in the short and medium term

A.C. 3.2 Determine and justify the existing strategic option that can meet the revised
strategic position

Learners are required to complete all tasks.

Assignment Guidelines
All work must be submitted in a single electronic document (.doc file). This
should go to the tutor and Centre Manager/Programme Director, plus one hard
copy posted to the Centre Manager.
Page 3 of 4

The assignment must be the Learner’s own work and not copies of theories or
models. Direct quotes should be kept to a minimum, and shown in inverted
commas. Models described and other quotes used must be properly attributed
and referenced as appropriate. Learners must acknowledge or reference any
sources that have been used to complete the assignment, listing reference
material and web sites used.

Learners are encouraged to produce a reflective statement of no more than 300
words (which does not count towards the final word count), describing the value
and knowledge gained from undertaking this assignment. The reflective
statement is not assessed; however it encourages you to review the value and
application of your learning.

Overall word count guide: 2500 – 4500

Plagiarism and Collusion
In submitting the assignment Learner’s must complete a statement of
authenticity confirming that the work submitted for all tasks is their own. The
statement should also include the word count.
Plagiarism and collusion are treated very seriously. Plagiarism involves presenting
work, excerpts, ideas or passages of another author without appropriate
referencing and attribution. Collusion occurs when two or more learners submit
work which is so alike in ideas, content, wording and/or structure that the
similarity goes beyond what might have been mere coincidence.
Appendices
Separate Appendices should not be used. Any use of tables, graphs, diagrams,
Gantt chart and flowcharts etc. that support the main report should be
incorporated into the back of the assignment report that is submitted. Any
published secondary information such as annual reports and company literature,
should be referenced in the main text of the assignment but not included.
Confidentiality
Where a Learner is using organisational information that deals with sensitive
material or issues, they must seek the advice and permission from that
organisation about its inclusion. Where confidentiality is an issue, Learners are
advised to anonymise their assignment report so that it cannot be attributed to
that particular organisation.
Word Count Policy
In total, the assignment report should be between 2500 – 4500 words. Learners
must comply with the required word count, within a margin of +10%.These rules
exclude the index (if used), headings and information contained within references
and bibliographies. When an assessment task requires learners to produce
presentation slides with supporting notes, the word count applies to the
supporting notes only.
Referencing and Professionalism
A professional approach to work is expected from all learners. Learners must
therefore identify and acknowledge ALL sources/methodologies/applications used.
The learner must use an appropriate referencing system to achieve this. Marks
are not awarded for the use of English; however the learner must express ideas
clearly and ensure that appropriate terminology is used to convey accuracy in
meaning.
Submission of Assignments
All work to be submitted on the due date as per Centre advice.
All work must be submitted in a single electronic document (.doc file). This should
go to the tutor and Centre Manager/Programme Director, plus one hard copy
posted to the Centre Manager.

Final Exam: INS-680-001-SUMMER2025-6–Techno Innovation & Entrepreneurship

/in /by

Final Exam: INS-680-001-SUMMER2025-6–Techno Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Instructions:

  • Answer all five questions. Total words count should not exceed 5000 words.
  • Use your course notes, readings, and project work.
  • Clearly demonstrate application of frameworks and personal interpretation.
  • You are NOT allowed use generative AI to write your answers. Responses must be based on your own understanding, experience, and analysis.
  • Submit through Blackboard

Question 1: Personal Entrepreneurial Reflection

Reflect on a time when you had to take initiative or solve a problem in a creative way. What entrepreneurial traits did you exhibit during that time? How would you handle the situation differently after taking this course?

Question 2: Opportunity Evaluation of a Real Business Idea

Identify a business idea you personally believe in (not from a textbook). Use any opportunity evaluation frameworks discussed in class or any other frameworks that you know (e.g., Market Gap Analysis, Opportunity Checklist, or Lean Canvas) to assess its viability. What are the most promising and risky elements of the idea?

Question 3: Interview Insights from a Practicing Entrepreneur

Summarize the key takeaways from a one-on-one conversation you had with a local entrepreneur. What were the biggest challenges they faced, and how do their experiences align (or conflict) with theories you studied in this course?

Question 4: Post-Mortem Analysis of a Failed Startup

Choose a real-life failed startup (not discussed in class). Conduct a post-mortem analysis using any opportunity evaluation frameworks discussed in class or any other frameworks that you know. What could the founders have done differently?

Question 5: Your Entrepreneurial Roadmap

Based on your learning in this course, create a 6-month action plan to move forward with either your own venture idea or a startup you want to join. Include milestones, metrics, and challenges. Justify your approach using concepts from the course.

 

BCOBM211 Strategies in A Disruptive World

/in /by

Task
Midterm Brief
Compare and contrast two specific competing companies from the same industry and outline their different mission and visions, their impact on strategies
and how do these companies address external threats and opportunities.
Group Work (3 students per team max).
• Assess their mission and vision. How clear are they and how helpful to determine their strategic direction. Analyze the similarities and differences in
details of both and accordingly analyze the implications of that on their strategy. Make sure you have the right vision and mission from credible
sources, otherwise develop those from credible sources.
• Assess also their values and do analyze critically whether they live by those value or not. Demonstrate using examples.
• Outline different trends from the external environment and explain how each company is uniquely addressing the different opportunities or threats
from the environment. Compare and contrast. No less than 3 trends and how each of these two companies are addressing it.
Individual Report
Choose a company from the above and provide your recommendation with regards to how you would go about rewriting their mission, vision and values
based on what has been discussed in the presentation. If you agree with part of it, provide your rationale. Demonstrate the importance of being a company
with a clearer DNA, clearer strategic direction, and more authentic values and explain that within the context of your company.
Formalities
• Total weight is 40% (with 40% going for presentation and 60% going for individual report).
• 20 slides presentation and 2000 words document.
• Every statement and observations need to be properly referenced.
• References needs to be credible; you might be asked during your presentation about the references, be ready.
• PDF for both to be submitted on Turnitin, Moodle on the eve of the midterm session.
• Use of AI needs to be documented.
Weight: 40% weight.
Deadline:
The eve of the midterm class, 23:59 PM. Submit under Midterm Evaluation Point.

Final Exam: Practical Part

/in /by

Final Exam: Practical Part

Student ID:                                                 Full Name:

Duration: 3 hours

Section # Question # Marks
 

A

 1 5
2 5
 

B

 3 10
4 10
 

C

 5 10
6 10
Total Marks  50

INSTRUCTIONS:

  • Answer ALL questions
  • Write clearly and structure your answers with appropriate headings
  • Please use this document to provide your answers, numbering them sequentially without including the questions themselves.
  • Support your answers with diagrams where applicable
  • Provide succinct and concise responses.
  • Submit your Work as a PDF.
  • AI-generated responses are strictly prohibited.

Application of Blockchain on Environmental Sustainability: Blockchain-Based Carbon Credit Systems

SECTION A: THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS (10 marks)

Question 1 (5 marks)
 The voluntary carbon market faces significant challenges, including double counting, lack of transparency, and high transaction costs.

  1. a) Explain the concept of “double counting” in carbon credits and how blockchain’s immutability and transparency properties can address this issue. (2 marks)
  2. b) Compare and contrast the traditional carbon credit registry system with a blockchain-based solution, highlighting THREE key advantages and TWO potential limitations of the blockchain approach. (2 marks)
  3. c) Critically evaluate how smart contracts could automate the verification and issuance of carbon credits. Include specific examples of contract triggers and execution conditions. (1 mark)

Question 2 (5 marks)
 Consensus mechanisms are crucial to blockchain functionality and environmental impact.

  1. a) Compare Proof of Work (PoW) and Proof of Stake (PoS) consensus mechanisms in terms of their environmental impact and suitability for a carbon credit marketplace. (2 marks)
  2. b) Propose a specialized consensus mechanism designed specifically for a carbon credit blockchain that balances security, decentralization, and environmental considerations. Justify your design choices. (1.5 marks)
  3. c) Explain how your proposed consensus mechanism would handle the validation of new carbon credit projects being added to the blockchain. (1.5 marks)

SECTION B: TECHNICAL IMPLEMENTATION (20 marks)

Question 3 (10 marks)
 You are designing a blockchain-based carbon credit system for a consortium of environmental organizations.

  1. a) Design the data structure for a carbon credit token that includes all necessary attributes for proper tracking, verification, and trading. Your answer should include:
  • Token attributes and metadata (1.5 mark)
  • Storage considerations (on-chain vs. off-chain) (1.5 mark)
  • Data validation mechanisms (1.5 mark)
  1. b) Create a system architecture diagram showing all key components of your blockchain solution, including interfaces with external systems such as verification bodies and trading platforms. Explain each component’s function briefly. (5.5 marks)

Question 4 (10 marks)
 Consider the following pseudo-code for a carbon credit issuance smart contract:

contract CarbonCreditRegistry {

struct CarbonCredit {

uint256 id;

address projectOwner;

uint256 amount; // in tonnes of CO2e

string projectLocation;

uint256 verificationDate;

address verifier;

bool isRetired;

string methodologyUsed;

}

 

mapping(uint256 => CarbonCredit) public credits;

mapping(address => bool) public authorizedVerifiers;

address public admin;

uint256 public nextCreditId;

 

event CreditIssued(uint256 indexed id, address indexed projectOwner, uint256 amount);

event CreditRetired(uint256 indexed id, address indexed retiredBy);

 

function issueCredit(address _projectOwner, uint256 _amount, string _projectLocation,

string _methodologyUsed) public returns (uint256) {

require(authorizedVerifiers[msg.sender], “Only authorized verifiers can issue credits”);

 

uint256 newCreditId = nextCreditId++;

credits[newCreditId] = CarbonCredit({

id: newCreditId,

projectOwner: _projectOwner,

amount: _amount,

projectLocation: _projectLocation,

verificationDate: block.timestamp,

verifier: msg.sender,

isRetired: false,

methodologyUsed: _methodologyUsed

});

 

emit CreditIssued(newCreditId, _projectOwner, _amount);

return newCreditId;

}

 

function retireCredit(uint256 _creditId) public {

require(credits[_creditId].projectOwner == msg.sender, “Only owner can retire credits”);

require(!credits[_creditId].isRetired, “Credit already retired”);

 

credits[_creditId].isRetired = true;

emit CreditRetired(_creditId, msg.sender);

}

}

 

 

  1. a) Identify and explain THREE security vulnerabilities or logical flaws in the provided smart contract. For each vulnerability, propose a specific code fix. (5 marks)
  2. b) Extend the contract with a function that enables carbon credit trading between parties, ensuring proper ownership transfer and payment verification. Include considerations for pricing mechanisms. (2.5 marks)
  3. c) Implement a function that allows partial retirement of carbon credits (i.e., retiring only a portion of a credit’s total amount). Explain any necessary changes to the data structure. (2.5 marks)

SECTION C: PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS AND CHALLENGES (20 marks)

Question 5 (10 marks)
 International carbon markets involve multiple jurisdictions, standards, and stakeholders.

  1. a) Analyze how a blockchain-based carbon credit system could be designed to comply with both the Paris Agreement’s Article 6 requirements and country-specific carbon regulations. (3 marks)
  2. b) Design a governance structure for a global, decentralized carbon credit blockchain that balances the interests of project developers, verifiers, buyers, regulators, and environmental NGOs. Include specific voting mechanisms and access controls. (4 marks)
  3. c) Evaluate the potential impacts of your proposed blockchain solution on carbon market participants in developing countries with limited technological infrastructure. Propose specific measures to ensure inclusivity. (3 marks)

Question 6 (10 marks)
 The integration of emerging technologies can enhance blockchain-based carbon credit systems.

  1. a) Examine how Internet of Things (IoT) devices could be integrated with a blockchain carbon credit system to provide automated, reliable measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV) of carbon sequestration or emissions reduction. Identify potential technical challenges and solutions. (3 marks)
  2. b) Analyze the trade-offs between on-chain and off-chain storage for environmental data, considering factors such as cost, scalability, and data integrity. Propose a hybrid approach that optimizes these factors. (3 marks)
  3. c) Design a blockchain-based solution that addresses the problem of “additionality” in carbon credit projects by creating transparent, verifiable proofs that projects wouldn’t have happened without carbon finance. Your solution should include both technical and governance components. (4 marks)

 

 

  Ass_HR__1_Indiviula[1] INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT

/in /by
Objective  

The objective of this assessment is to evaluate students’ understanding and ability to analyze the impact of cultural factors on essential HRM functions as well as  analyzing organizational issues from a global perspective using relevant contexts and theories from 21-century perspective. In addition, this investigation will be linked to the context of the UAE, as the government of Abu Dhabi, took the commitment as part of its economic vision 2030 to focus on four key priorities and one of them is Social and Human Resources Development. Thus, the initiative emphasizes on mismatch skills and knowledge between education and labor market demand amongst Emirati. The cultural context of the UAE has significant implications on essential HRM functions, and IHRM practitioners need to be sensitive to cultural differences and adapt their practices accordingly.
Aligned CLO (s) CLO 3 ( Analyze impact of cultural factors on essential HRM functions.)
Total Marks 30 marks / 30%
Rubric (embedded document) Business Case Analysis Rubric
Report Format  

The individual report should not be less than 2500 words or more than 3000 words, double spaced, excluding the cover page, table of contents, and reference list. A minimum of 6 journal articles ranging from 2017 to 2024 should be listed as references in individual report conforming APA format.

The submission must use the cover page provided.

Each student must choose one topic from the below list.

Students should submit papers to Turnitin Assignments via Blackboard with identifying information included in the paper (e.g., name or student number), the system will automatically show this information to faculty when viewing the submission, but the information will not be retained by Turnitin. The threshold applied to the similarity index is less than 20%.
Citation Format  

APA.

Refer here:

https://www.citationmachine.net/apa

https://www.scribbr.com/citation/generator/apa/

 
Issue Date 28/04/2025 Due Date 12/06/2025, Thursdaybefore 10 pm

 

 

 

 

 

 

INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT GENERAL GUIDELINE

 

  1. Each student will be expected to analyse impact of cultural factors on essential HRM functions through reviewing and analysing business case / articles.
  2. Each student must choose one topic from the list of below Culture dimensions.
  3. Institutional Collectivism
  4. In-Group Collectivism
  5. Uncertainty Avoidance
  6. Power Distance
  7. Gender Egalitarianism
  8. Assertiveness
  9. Performance Orientation
  10. Humane Orientation
  11. In your paper, you will analyse impact of the selected cultural dimension on essential HRM functions. (HR planning, staffing, recruitment, performance management, training and development, talent management, compensation and benefits.
  12. The paper should not be less than 2500 words or more than 3000 words in double spacing, 12-point font size, and Arial or Times New Roman font type, excluding the cover page, table of contents and reference list.
  13. A minimum of 6 journal articles ranged from 2017 and 2024 should be listed as references in your report.
  14. Use the cover page provided for report submission.
  15. These assignments are formal APA papers, so it is necessary to cite, quote and reference ideas that you have used to build your post. Paraphrasing is preferred to quotes as that demonstrates your grasp of the ideas, but if you use someone else’s words, makes sure to quote, cite and reference.

Refer here for accurate APA citation and referencing: https://www.scribbr.com/apa–citationgenerator/

Refer here for MSWord APA citation and referencing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEdpjsOEVVc

  1. The report is to be submitted on Turnitin via the Blackboard, The threshold applied to the similarity index is less than 20%.

 

 

 

STEPS TO FOLLOW:

 

  1. Select one topic from the above mentioned list .
  2. Seek the approval of the instructor  .
  3. Here are some guiding criteria to help you focus your report:
    1. CLO3: Case summary and problem definition (15%)
  • Identify the challenges/ problems/ issues being studied from the article /case study.
  • Explain why the challenges/ problems / issues being studied from the article/case study are important to be addressed.
    1. CLO3: Application of Theory (20%)
  • Apply suitable theory and develop appropriate solutions to particular cultural context of IHRM
    1. CLO3: Critical analysis (20%)
  • Analyse the implication from your critical perspective and relate it to 21-century IHRM practices and perspective
    1. CLO3: Recommendations (30%)
  • Examine and recommend implications relevant to the UAE: market, policy, strategies etc relevant to the UAE economic vision 2030 to focus on four key priorities and one of them is Social and Human Resources Development.
    1. CLO3: Overall writing and structure (15%)
  • Structure and organization: Follow basic rules of a 5-paragraph essay (although there may be more paragraphs) – clear report in the introduction, recap of main points and in conclusion.
  • Citations and reference: When you use someone words exactly quote and cite. When you paraphrase someone’s ideas; cite. In both cases provide references.
  • 5 paragraph essay formats:

 

 

 

 

General Instructions

 

  1. Late submission
  • There will be a 5% penalty for every day late. No submissions will be accepted after the deadlines. Assignment MUST be submitted before the due date. There will be NO exceptions.
  • To ensure the submission is submitted before the deadline, kindly submit your assignment much earlier to avoid bottleneck in the system.
  • Be reminded that Turnitin will need 24 hours to generate the similarity index for 2nd submission and onwards of the same assignment.

 

  1. No plagiarism please [100% penalty]
    • If you use text from the textbook/case study, please make sure you paraphrase it in a way that fits with your overall discussion. Please put an appropriate citation to make it explicit that you are using information from the sources. If you think the text fits into your discussion without paraphrasing, please cite it in a way that makes it clear that this is a direct quote (e.g. indent a paragraph containing text or put a sentence in quotes)
    • Do not use information from the Internet to answer any of the questions. Please use your own thinking/writing to answer the questions.

 

GROUP PROJECT DESCRIPTION

/in /by
Project Objective ·         This project assignment is designed to help you apply the concepts and theories learned in the Introduction to Management course to a real-world organization.

·         You will select an organization of your choice and conduct an in-depth analysis of its management practices.

·         The goal is to provide you with a hands-on understanding of how management principles are implemented in various business settings.

·         Please go through the following two links and choose one company to work on:

·         Link 1: https://www.forbesmiddleeast.com/list/50-startups-to-watch-in-the-arab-world-1

·         Link 2: https://waya.media/these-are-the-6-most-innovative-companies-of-2020-in-the-middle-east/
Aligned CLO (s) CLO 3
Total Marks 30 marks
Rubric (embedded document) Group Project Rubric
Report Format ·         Students are required to form a group consisting of 3-4 members.

·         Doctor approval is required for the selection of the company.

·         Team report should be minimum of 6000 words in length.

·         The cover page must include full names of all members, IDs and a title. Both the cover page and the content page as well as appendices are counted as part of the word limit.

·         The group leaders are required to submit a soft copy (word.doc) via Turnitin – Blackboard. The system will automatically show this information to faculty when viewing the submission, but Turnitin will not retain the information. The threshold applied to the similarity index is less than 20%.

·         Presentations will be assessed individually; hence each group member is responsible to prepare and present certain slides that exhibit your contribution to the group project. There will be a 10-minute question-and-answer session following each main presentation. This part will also be graded. Each student will be evaluated based on the quality of their understanding and contribution and will be graded out of 10% (individual evaluation).
Citation Format APA.

Refer here:

https://www.citationmachine.net/apa

https://www.scribbr.com/citation/generator/apa/

 

 

GROUP PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

 

PART I: REPORT- 20 Marks [9-10 pages in all, Times New Roman 12 single space – excluding references and cover page]

Go through the following steps with the company:

  1. Conduct some research about the company and its product/service lines through its website and other reliable web resources. Cite your sources in references, using APA citation.

 

  1. Write a 3-5 page analytical report (no bullet points please) to describe and analyze the story of the company. Include a PESTLE analysis to identify key factors present in their general external environment. You may add visuals to illustrate or support your analysis.

Make sure to include the following details into the report:

  1. Name and origin of the company.
  2. Founder and his/her story- their core business idea/concept and leadership qualities (or style).
  3. Mission and vision- based on available information.
  4. Products and added value- what makes them special/unique.
  5. Customer segments- who are their current/targeted customer base.
  6. Competition- briefly analyze using your knowledge of Porter’s model.
  7. Markets it operates in- your analysis of their target markets.
  8. Organization- what is the structure of the firm, present organizational chart if available.
  9. Key financial figures- key financial indicators and trends of their business performance.
  10. Future plans- projections as based on available information.

 

  1. Define the organization’s key competitive advantage by doing a SWOT analysis.

 

  1. If your group was the top management team of this company (CEO, CFO and so on), consider the key challenges/current condition facing the company now. What would be some of the strategic decisions you would make for the organization, for the next 3 years? Provide clear reasons and arguments behind these decisions. Be specific in your response and relate them to management/business concepts learnt in the course- about leadership, strategy and team building. You may like to use some academic resources to make business specific recommendations, to strengthen your work.

 

  1. Include a professional executive summary at the beginning of your report- written in no more than 250 words.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General Instructions

  • Late submission
    • There will be a 5% penalty for every day late. No submissions will be accepted after the deadlines. Assignment MUST be submitted before the due date. There will be NO exceptions.
    • To ensure the submission is submitted before the deadline, kindly submit your assignment much earlier to avoid bottleneck in the system.
    • Be reminded that Turnitin will need 24 hours to generate the similarity index for 2nd submission and onwards of the same assignment.

 

  • No plagiarism please [100% penalty + referral to the OAI]
    • If you use text from the textbook/case study, please make sure you paraphrase it in a way that fits with your overall discussion. Please put an appropriate citation to make it explicit that you are using information from the sources. If you think the text fits into your discussion without paraphrasing, please cite it in a way that makes it clear that this is a direct quote (e.g. indent a paragraph containing text or put a sentence in quotes).
    • Do not use information from the Internet to answer any of the questions. Please use your own thinking/writing to answer the questions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Group Project Report Rubric

Course Code: MGT482-PC

CLO Assessed: CLO3

Assessment Weight: 20% of total grade

Criteria Exceeds Standard

90 % or above

 Meets Standard

75% to 89%

 Below Standard

less than 75%
Executive Summary

(3 Marks)

 Clearly states the purpose and main points of the business project, effectively communicates the key messages and goals of the business, and provides a comprehensive overview of the contents of the business project. States the purpose and main points of the business, communicates the key messages and goals of the project to some extent, but may lack comprehensiveness. Does not effectively state the purpose and main points of the business project, does not effectively communicate the key messages and goals of the project, and provides a limited overview of the contents of the project.
Application of theory

5 Marks

 A wide range of sophisticated and relevant theories and concepts are found and synthesized to give a coherent and novel analytical frame. Appropriate theories and concepts are identified. Work in this categorization demonstrates solid understanding and well-developed skills in synthesizing literatures relevant to the topic. There has been no effort to identify relevant theories and concepts.
Critical analysis and interpretation

7 Marks

 Excellent application of relevant theory/concepts in the work. The insights and critical understanding obtained from the theories are of excellent quality. The discussion synthesizes complicated concepts and ideas. Work displays effective integration of important theory/concepts. The theories provide useful insights as well as some critical observations. Analysis is unclear, and the literature review fails to critically understand the necessary theories and concepts.
Evidence base

7 Marks

 Work in this categorization displays a vast body of data to back up the analysis. The evidence is quite relevant and directly connects to the themes identified by the frameworks offered in the theoretical part. The selection and application of facts to support the analysis is reasonable. The evidence base provides a sound platform for understanding the problem. There is no evidence of an attempt to critically review and reflect on the problem analysis.
Discussion

7 Marks

 There are strong connections between the results, theoretical frameworks, and evidence base. The report makes a good attempt to connect conclusions to theoretical frameworks and the empirical foundation. There is no identification or use of facts to support the examination of the problem
Conclusion

3 Marks

 The conclusion is well-developed and demonstrates applicability and relevance to practice in general. Conclusion is well-developed, demonstrating some thought and applicability to practice in general Conclusion is simple and struggles to demonstrate thought and applicability to practice.
Overall writing and structure

3 Marks

 Effectively uses an academic style and has no errors related to organization, or use of APA citation formatting Uses an academic style and has minimal errors related to organization, or use of APA citation formatting Uses an incoherent style and there are major errors related to organization, or use of APA citation formatting

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Group Project Presentation Rubric

Course Code:      MGT482-PC        

CLOs Assessed: CLO3

Assessment Weight: 10% of total grade

Criteria Exceeds Standards

90 % or more

 Meets Standards

75% to 89

 Below Standards

less than 75%
Organization & Content

 

2 Marks

 

 

 Information is presented in logical, interesting, and flowing sequence from introduction through conclusion. The content depth supports assertions and recommendations.

 

 Logical sequence of information allows the audience to follow presentation from introduction to the conclusion.

 

 

 Audience has difficulty following the presentation, unsupported assertions or illogical conclusions.

 

 
Research, Subject Knowledge, Resources

 

4 Marks

 Presenter demonstrates an in-depth subject knowledge expertise in subject through clear and concise explanation, elaboration, question and answer, and key points delivery. Credible, in-depth, and accurate research and analysis with cited references that support presentation.

 

 Presenter demonstrates good subject knowledge, is at ease with material, answers questions thoroughly, solid research and analysis with cited references.

 

 Basic knowledge of subject is demonstrated, and elaboration is minimal or presenter fails to answer questions with limited references and research.

 

 
Visual Aids

 

2 Marks

 Clear and creative visual aids enhance the presentation, reinforce key points, and engage the audience.

 

 

 Presentation has relevant visual aids that provide evidence to support assertions and recommendations.

 

 Limited visual aids support presentation.

 

 

 
Delivery

 

2 Marks

 Presenter clearly and effectively communicates ideas; concise highlighting of key points is engaging; and excellent timekeeping.

 

 

 Presenter clearly and effectively communicates key ideas, speaking and pace comfortable for audience; and good timekeeping. Presenter’s pace is too slow or fast, jumps around, voice is low or unclear, multiple interjections distract audience, or fails to elaborate on key findings; and poor timekeeping.

 

 

IEM103 Assessment

/in /by

 

Seat Number:

 
Student ID:

 
رقم هوية الطالب:
Course Code:

 
رقم الطاولة:
رمز المساق:
IEM103

 
ASSESSMENT 3
Version: 1        ☒ 2        ☐ 3        ☐
  3 Hours 2 Hours  
Exam Duration: NA ☐ ☐ مدة الاختبار

 

Instructions التعليمات
·         Use pen only. Pencils are not allowed. ·          استخدم قلم الحبر فقط، يمنع استخدام أقلام الرصاص.
·         Display your ID card during exam time for verification. ·          ضع أمامك بطاقة هوية الطالب طوال مدة الاختبار للتحقق منها.

 

  Open Book Closed Book  
The exam is: NA ☐ ☐ الاختبار:

 

It is compulsory to list the permitted open sources a student can take into an open book examination.

Please list the sources below:

 

List of Open Book Material: التعليمات عليمات اختبارات الكتب المفتوحة
·         You’re only allowed to bring paper-based materials. ·         يسمح لك أن تستخدم فقط مصادر ورقية.
   
Section/Question CLO Max Grade Earned Grade
S1 CLO2 / CLO3 15  
S2 CLO2 / CLO3 15  
S3 CLO2 / CLO3 15  
S4 CLO2 / CLO3 15  
S5 CLO2 / CLO3 15  
S6 CLO2 / CLO3 15  
S7 CLO2 / CLO3 10  
  Total Grade 100  

 

ACADEMIC HONESTY REMINDER:

 

Dishonest behavior in examinations is not permitted.  The Academy will impose disciplinary measures on students including dismissal, with a permanent record on the transcript.

 


GROUP PRESENTATION

 

CLO2: Evaluate political intelligence (PI) and the role it plays in leadership, managing self and others, and influencing and delivering on performance.

CLO3: Appraise personal resilience (PR) and its links to EI, working under pressure, stress management and work life balance.

Scenario

You were recently promoted in your job whereby leadership, managing yourself and others, and influencing and delivering on performance are key elements to your position. However, dealing with the pressures attached to this demanding position, coupled with your responsibility

to family life requires you to have strategies to cope and be resilient.

As a consequence, you are now evaluating how you can be more politically intelligent to manage your team and other stakeholders, while at the same time find strategies to make you more personally resilient.

 

 

Tasks

  1. How might you apply Political Intelligence (PI) to positively influence others and improve on performance while you are feeling the pressures of your role
  2. Describe how Emotional Intelligence (EI) may play part with being resilient
  3. Discuss Positive Psychology and its relationship to being resilient
  4. What Personal Resilience (PR) strategies will you employ to be more resilient to managing the stress and pressure of work to establish a work/life balance.

 

 

Your presentation must use the RA template provided and include the following:

  • Introduction
  • Application of Political Intelligence (PI) to influence and perform under stress
  • Emotional Intelligence (EI) and Resilience
  • Positive Psychology and being resilient
  • Personal Resilience (PR) strategies to establish a work/life balance
  • Recommendations
  • Conclusion
  • References

 

Group tasks in the classroom are designed to replicate working in a professional team environment where objectives, timelines, coordination of tasks, and different personality traits, skills, and experience may influence outcome.

As this is a group task with a tight timeline, it is very important to ensure you work together as a team and contribute accordingly to achieve the best possible result.

Hence, as this is a group effort you will also need to decide on a presenter who will orally present your work in no more than 20 minutes.

All students must be present for the presentation. A 20% deduction of grade will be incurred for non-attendance

 

YOU MUST ENSURE YOUR GROUP NUMBER / STUDENT NAME / ID INFORMATION IS INCLUDED IN THE TEMPLATE

 

Project length:

Written: 1500 words (not including citations and references)

Oral: 15-20 minutes

 

Format:

4 Bullet points

4 Lines each

         

Moodle Submission / Presentation Day:

Section A: 5 August 2025 14.30 hrs

Section B: 7 August 2025 11.00 hrs

 

Assessment Weight: 20% of overall grade

 

Section/ Question CLO Max Grade %
Criterion 1

Introduction – Brief overview  presentation task

 CLO2 CLO3 15
Criterion 2

Discussion on the application of Political Intelligence (PI) to influence and perform under stress

 CLO2 CLO3 15
Criterion 3

Discussion of the relationship of Emotional Intelligence (EI) and Resilience

 CLO2 CLO3 15
Criterion 4

Discussion on Positive Psychology and being resilient

 

 CLO2 CLO3 15
Criterion 5

Discussion on Personal Resilience (PR) strategies to

establish a work/life

balance

 CLO2 CLO3 15
Criterion 6

Detailing the benefits of enhancing the resilience strategies

 CLO2 CLO3 15
Criterion 7

Conclusion

 

 CLO2 CLO3 10
Total Grade 100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

Assessment 1 – IEM103 Emotional Intelligence and Personal Resilience

/in /by

Course Learning Outcomes

CLO1: Justify Emotional Intelligence (EI) with awareness of the concepts of Cultural Intelligence (CQ) in the context of professional interactions within the UAE.

CLO4: Critique the application of EI in the context of interactions with internal and external stakeholders.

 

Scope:

You have recently finished your Bachelor of Science degree from Rabdan Academy and have returned to your organisation. You consider that Emotional Intelligence (EI) and Cultural Intelligence (CQ) plays an important role in leadership, managing yourself and others, whilst influencing your task performance.

You also consider that raising self-awareness through the use of EI self-assessment tools like that conducted

in class, may assist in recognising how your emotional responses and cultural adaptability may navigate yourself politically in the workplace to benefit you, your organisation, and your contribution to the resilience of the UAE. Hence, the project is designed to enhance a personal awareness of your emotional schema and cultural adaptability while applying it to professional practice applications.

 

Project Task

  1. Discuss the main aspects of Emotional Intelligence (EI) and
  2. How does Emotional Intelligence relate to Cultural Intelligence (CQ) in a multi-cultural environment to help understand risk and resilience?

Hence your project will have eight (8) headings in PowerPoint presentation style as follows:

  1. Introduction
  2. What is Emotional Intelligence (EI)
  3. What is Cultural Intelligence (CQ)
  4. Managing Emotional Intelligence (EI) and Cultural Intelligence
  5. The effect of EI and CQ within organisations
  6. The benefits of EI and CQ in understanding risk and resilience
  7. Recommendations
  8. References

 

 

Further information

  • 20% contribution to your overall grade
  • 2000 word count, consider context of question, learning outcome and scope
  • Use only the RA PowerPoint template provided

•      4 bullet points per page / 3-4 lines each bullet point

  • Use of library and Learning Resource Centre is compulsory
  • References and citations must be used

•      Submit via Moodle ONLY

  • As there is a data bank of material on this subject, ALL presentations will be

vetted for plagiarism i.e. work that is not your own

  • Refer to grading rubric attached

 

Date due:

Last Session Week 3

 

Submission via Moodle Turnitin Portal only Week 3

Penalty of 10% for each day late

 

Note that while this is a presentation, it will not be presented in class – Personal email submissions will not be accepted